[Government Watch] It’s Blog for Fair Pay Day!

Blog for Fair Pay Day Graphic

You’d be forgiven for thinking that the Paycheck Fairness Act (currently pending in the Senate) is a little off topic for a blog about the beauty industry, seeing as the vast majority of beauty industry workers are female. In fact, I just spent 20 minutes trying to figure out the gender wage gap for salon workers, and the best I can find is a Bureau of Labor Statistics chart that says 268,000 female “hairdressers, hair stylists and cosmetologists” earned a median income of $413 per week (just under $22,000 per year) in 2009, but that data was not recorded for their male counterparts because there are less than 50,000 male hair stylists in the country (and BLS doesn’t track data on occupation segments that small). This doesn’t surprise me because there is not one male student currently enrolled in all of Beauty U.

So, hooray, the beauty industry has no wage gap, because it has no male employees! Here’s what it does have: A disproportionate majority of male salon owners, male celebrity stylists and male brand CEOs. My favorite would be John Paul DeJoria, co-founder of Paul Mitchell, one of the biggest chains of hair products, salons and beauty schools, who has a net worth of $4 billion.

Yes. $4 billion, while the women who cut hair in his salons and teach in his schools earn $413 per week. Gender gap speaking, the beauty industry is still stuck somewhere in Mad Men Season 1, before Peggy gets promoted to copy writer.

And there’s another, more insidious and more widespread way that the beauty industry contributes to the wage gap: What Naomi Wolf calls “the professional beauty qualification” or PBQ, where all manner of jobs require women to look and dress a certain way in order to maintain their employment.

From The Beauty Myth, pages 52-53:

Urban professional women are devoting up to a third of their income to “beauty maintenance” and considering it a necessary investment. [...] The few women who are finally earning as much as men are forced, through the PBQ, to pay themselves significantly less than their male counterparts take home. It has engineered do-it-yourself income discrimination.

There are so many things wrong with this picture, the Paycheck Fairness Act can’t begin to correct them all. But it will strengthen current laws against wage discrimination, ban retaliation against workers who disclose their wages, and allow women to receive the same remedies for sex-based pay discrimination that are currently available to those subject to discrimination based on race and national origin. So you should tell your Senator to support it.




Filed under Beauty Schooled, Beauty Standards, Career Opportunities, Government Watch

Tagged as , , ,


One Comment

  1. DDT
    Posted April 21, 2010 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Okay, I’d like to weigh in on this. BLS numbers are affected by a number of things. One of the reasons that these numbers are low is that many stylists who work on tips, cash payments, on their own, etc. don’t report their full income. A stylist who “earns” $800 a week through a combination of hourly pay, commissions, tips, etc. may only report that they earned $400 or $500.

    This only hurts them down the road unless they are very disciplined and save that money somehow (which could lead to trouble in an audit). A stylist who claims low income, pays taxes for low income and then gets injured or can’t work, wants to retire or sell their salon is unable to collect due to their “low income”. Social Security is affected, tax returns are affected, and the industry is affected when these studies are published.

3 Trackbacks

  1. [...] like how Naomi Wolf (Ooh, second Wolf call-back in the same week, guess what I’m reading right now?) acknowledges that as much as it creates competition and [...]

  2. [...] The great irony of the fashion and beauty industries is that women already play a huge role, by making up the vast majority of fashion models and salon workers. The face of both industries is decidedly female. And yet — only a small percentage of that female workforce achieves the kind of fame, professional validation and prosperity that we associate with “glamour” jobs like model and hair stylist. Plus, the majority of company CEOs, board members and even top fashion designers are male. John Paul DeJoria, co-founder of Paul Mitchell, one of the biggest chains of hair products, salons and beauty schools, has a net worth of $4 billion. While the women who cut hair in his salons and teach in his schools earn $413 per week. [...]

  3. [...] boy am I sad that things aren’t any better than they were when we did this last year. Working women in the United States are still making less than 80 cents for every dollar earned by [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


    The Eating Insinct: Food Culture, Body Image, and Guilt in America by Virginia Sole Smith

    Pre-order now!